rubl
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
The wondering type
Posts: 23,997
Likes: 9,333
|
Post by rubl on Aug 12, 2017 14:13:06 GMT 7
256TB!! Which reminds me I still have two 240 MB SCSI drives somewhere in my archive, only need 1.005.000 of those Of course having 256TB means you don't need to worry about cleanup to free space although you might want some tools to 'find' your stuff again. Also a good and fast backup solution might be in order. "Horsemen of the disk-drive apocalypse will ride upon 256TB SSDs Analysis: It's not a good week to be in the disk-drive business as solid-state tech news signals their imminent death – all due to a murderous group formed of Intel/Micron, Samsung, SK Hynix and Toshiba/WDC. How so? There are two disk drive formats – 2.5 and 3.5-inch – and three disk drive manufacturers – Seagate, Toshiba and Western Digital. Fast 15,000rpm 2.5-inch disk drives are being replaced now by SSDs and 10K drives face the same because they are stuck at a 2TB or so capacity level. SSDs in the same format reach 11TB, 4.5 times more, and have far shorter data access times and lower rack space, power and cooling needs." www.theregister.co.uk/2017/08/10/128tb_ssds_signal_coming_armageddon_for_disk_drives/
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2017 18:49:48 GMT 7
SSDs are nice and responsive there is a noticable difference in boot speed and actual use, but you need to keep a nice blank space for over provisioning/TRIM.
Also the more layers of cells the more prone the cells are to wearing out, I guess as technology advances they might find a solution to that.
If you fill an SSD up to 90% and continue writing to it, it will die a lot quicker than if only 50% of the space was used.
They're not very economical when it comes to price per GB, hope to see that change but for general storage I prefer platter drives, however I dont own a server though.
|
|
rubl
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
The wondering type
Posts: 23,997
Likes: 9,333
|
Post by rubl on Aug 12, 2017 19:22:51 GMT 7
There remains a need for backups. Now SSDs left alone and powered off might 'lose' their contents after a while. HDD may no longer startup if left alone too long, but the contents is mostly recoverable (and expensive to do so. CD/DVD has limited capacity. Tape is expensive and needs to be kept in an 'controlled environment' and some have read/rewritten at least once a year. Backup of a few TB of data will also tax your device somewhat. So, may I get back to my personal favourite "organise and cleanup". Not mindlessly though, some things need to be kept. Like photo's, cuts from newspapers, my first manual lovingly scanned page by page, etc., etc.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2017 20:17:29 GMT 7
^^^ Had this backup issue 3 weeks ago, main drive got disconnected by intels rapid storage utility, clicked the bubble to see what drive it was...Blue screen
Waits for the memory dump to complete....it couldn't (unknowingly) the main drive was offline (no back up made, 18 years worth of irreplaceable stuff on there).
Reboot computer check the bios to see which drive it was, the main drive has disappeared, usually controller board failure.
Few reboots, cable checks...nope, disconnected all other drives tried again and it came back...Switched it off unplugged it ordered a new drive in hope I would have enough time to clone it to the new one.
Luckily it worked and is still alive now (touches wood), no SMART errors.
Lesson learned, always have multiple backups of data you care for and keep them in seperate locations.
|
|