AyG
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
Posts: 5,871 
Likes: 4,555
|
Post by AyG on Oct 26, 2018 8:50:44 GMT 7
|
|
Mosha
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
Posts: 5,678
Likes: 2,898
|
Post by Mosha on Oct 26, 2018 19:43:33 GMT 7
|
|
siampolee
Detective
Alive alive O
Posts: 14,106
Likes: 8,932
Member is Online
|
Post by siampolee on Oct 26, 2018 20:06:57 GMT 7
That's the Arab way boys for pleasure, women for fun, especially prepubescent girls as the pedophile grooming gangs show us.
Some folk here support those creatures as noted by their tacit silence on the issue
|
|
AyG
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 4,555
|
Post by AyG on Oct 26, 2018 20:07:09 GMT 7
|
|
rubl
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
The wondering type
Posts: 23,600
Likes: 8,956
|
Post by rubl on Oct 26, 2018 22:18:21 GMT 7
Mohammed around 630 A.D. Well, not sure about the child rapist part, but lots of 'leaders' (wordly or religious) were not really better. |
|
AyG
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 4,555
|
Post by AyG on Oct 27, 2018 7:42:59 GMT 7
It would appear that calling Islam's "prophet" a bigoted, mass murdering child rapist is illegal in Europe, even if it's incontrovertibly true. Mohammed around 630 A.D. Well, not sure about the child rapist part, but lots of 'leaders' (wordly or religious) were not really better.[/quote] There really is a key difference: I'm allowed to say "King Æthelstan was a bigoted, mass murdering child rapist" (even though it may not be true) without fear of prosecution. It seems that one historical figure* is given special protection in law, and one is not allowed to tell the extremely unpleasant truth about him. * Actually, it's unclear there was an historical Mohammed. Some academics maintain he was invented a couple of hundred years after his supposed historical life for political purposes. Others (most notably Prof. Karl-Heinz Ohlig) maintain that Mohammed actually refers to Jesus. It could be that the ECHR is giving protection to a figure in one fairy tale, but not protecting the likes of Santa Claus from vicious attacks on their characters. |
|
rubl
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
The wondering type
Posts: 23,600
Likes: 8,956
|
Post by rubl on Oct 27, 2018 13:10:11 GMT 7
AyG: "It would appear that calling Islam's "prophet" a bigoted, mass murdering child rapist is illegal in Europe, even if it's incontrovertibly true." Mohammed around 630 A.D. Well, not sure about the child rapist part, but lots of 'leaders' (wordly or religious) were not really better. There really is a key difference: I'm allowed to say "King Æthelstan was a bigoted, mass murdering child rapist" (even though it may not be true) without fear of prosecution. It seems that one historical figure* is given special protection in law, and one is not allowed to tell the extremely unpleasant truth about him. * Actually, it's unclear there was an historical Mohammed. Some academics maintain he was invented a couple of hundred years after his supposed historical life for political purposes. Others (most notably Prof. Karl-Heinz Ohlig) maintain that Mohammed actually refers to Jesus. It could be that the ECHR is giving protection to a figure in one fairy tale, but not protecting the likes of Santa Claus from vicious attacks on their characters. Blasphemy is still in the law books of many countries, same like Lèse-majesté. Would seem progress is slow. |
|
3
Crazy Mango
Posts: 961
Likes: 706
|
Post by 3 on Oct 29, 2018 5:40:52 GMT 7
|
|
3
Crazy Mango
Posts: 961
Likes: 706
|
Post by 3 on Oct 29, 2018 5:44:22 GMT 7
Germany needs more black dogs of the four legged kind
|
|
rott
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 2,780
|
Post by rott on Nov 1, 2018 11:41:31 GMT 7
I suppose "insult" will come to be interpreted as meaning any comment or observation that muslims choose to be offended by.
|
|
