Of the suggestions:
BH Macro and BH Global. - Really not clear what it actually invests in. Feeder funds for Brevan Howard master funds. Who?
![LOL](//storage.proboards.com/6207754/images/7WqwXnsEcase2oKDoa3y.png)
Though it did seem to have a good year last year = up over 30%\
Ruffer Investment Companywww.trustnet.com/factsheets/t/i009/ruffer-investment-company-ltd-red-ptg-prefHave looked at this a few times over the years. In recent years seems less incentive to invest in it than ever. I'd rather hold a good THB deposit account
- It seemed to have been trading at or close to a premium for ages. Couldn't really understand why. But looks like investors are realising its consistent poor performance now and in 2019 switched to a discount
- Around half of the funds is invested in inflation linked bonds. As mentioned on other threads, someone would do better just buying an index fund for that 50%-ish and probably a global equity tracker for the remainder
- Annual management fee of 1% and OCF of 1.18%. So fees seem on the high side. When you consider what it actually invests in those fees are outrageous. As mentioned on the thread about inflation linked bonds there are ETFs and funds investing in inflation linked bonds with fees of 0.07% - 0.15% in a tracker. Doesn't look like RICA are adding any value whatsoever in that area. Just costing you 1.18% for the half of the funds in index linked instead of 0.07%-0.15% !
If you buy it you're not exactly paying for outperformace either:
> 5 year share price total return of 7.7%. That's cumulative not annualised! Annualised is just over 1% a year. (Think THB deposits again
![LOL](//storage.proboards.com/6207754/images/7WqwXnsEcase2oKDoa3y.png)
) NAV has fared a little better at 12.7% cumulative or just over 2% a year. Nothing short of abysmal
The article states:
Then goes on to say:
So that idea of not losing money over any 12month period gets blown out of the water significantly. The joke gets worse though when you look at Ruffer's link on Trustnet and see it actually lost money in 3 out of 5 rolling 12 month periods. 3 in 5 years rolling 12m periods lost money and it's suggested to help when absolute funds can't
![LOL](//storage.proboards.com/6207754/images/7WqwXnsEcase2oKDoa3y.png)
Aiming to beat cash is a very low objective too.
- Worse still for anyone in Thailand. That 7.7% gain over 5 years would have been totally wiped out by exchange rate movements, with GBP losing ball park 20%-ish vs THB over 5 years
Gabelli Merger Plus+- Small fund. Not very liquid to boot
- What happens in a downturn when mergers/acquisitions dry up
-----------------------------------------------------------
So all in all, Ruffer and Gabelli I wouldn't touch with a barge pole. The BH funds really would need a lot of investigating and understanding exactly what you're investing in. But hardly transparent on an initial reading
Nice question in the article. Answers leave a lot to be desired