rubl
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
The wondering type
Posts: 23,529
Likes: 8,892
|
Post by rubl on Mar 28, 2019 22:00:33 GMT 7
I haven't read the report yet, so this remark from a FOX Business legal analyst may be wrong. Mind you all flurry to hide' the report seems somewhat strange. One would have thought that if it completely exonerates Pres. Trump both he and his GOPpies would love to show the people. "Trump news - live: Mueller report said to 'undoubtedly' contain evidence of conspiracy, as president rages over Jussie Smollett and Mexico on Twitter The Mueller report “undoubtedly” contains evidence of collusion between Donald Trump and Russia, according to Fox Business legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano, contradicting the verdict of attorney-general William Barr and risking the president’s ire." news.yahoo.com/trump-news-live-america-apos-090706546.html
|
|
AyG
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 4,555
|
Post by AyG on Mar 29, 2019 7:13:44 GMT 7
"I haven't read the report yet", and if the Republicans have their way you never will.
One of the problems with impeachment is the very high level of proof is required. Clearly the report doesn't reach that level, or Mueller would have said so. It doesn't mean that the report doesn't contain evidence of collusion. In all probability it does.
|
|
rubl
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
The wondering type
Posts: 23,529
Likes: 8,892
|
Post by rubl on Apr 7, 2019 17:18:52 GMT 7
A dearDonalTrump tweet from 10:52 PM - Apr 6, 2019
"So, let’s get this straight! There was No Collusion and in fact the Phony Dossier was a Con Job that was paid for by Crooked Hillary and the DNC. So the 13 Angry Democrats were investigating an event that never happened and that was in fact a made up Fraud. I just fought back..."
So, let's get this straight, we are still waiting to see the report which so fully exonerates our dearDonald even though it's written by a Mueller and his 13 Angry Democrats.
|
|
AyG
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 4,555
|
Post by AyG on Apr 7, 2019 18:24:41 GMT 7
A dearDonalTrump tweet from 10:52 PM - Apr 6, 2019 I think your typing may have had a few problems. Did you mean "Anal Trump"? After all that's where trumps come from. (If you're not familiar with the English slang, a "trump" is a fart.)
|
|
rubl
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
The wondering type
Posts: 23,529
Likes: 8,892
|
Post by rubl on Apr 7, 2019 18:52:40 GMT 7
A dearDonalTrump tweet from 10:52 PM - Apr 6, 2019 I think your typing may have had a few problems. Did you mean "Anal Trump"? After all that's where trumps come from. (If you're not familiar with the English slang, a "trump" is a fart.) Since some have it that Donny-boy is a genius surpassing even the Nobel Prize deserving Kim dynasty, might you mean brain farts?
|
|
rubl
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
The wondering type
Posts: 23,529
Likes: 8,892
|
Post by rubl on Apr 10, 2019 22:59:05 GMT 7
Remember the Mueller report which totally exonerates Trump? No? Well, that seems part of the strategy. Also the report was produced by Mueller and his 13 angry Dems and Donny Trump called the witch hunt an attempted coup just now. Seems strange that their report would completely exonerate Trump. Surely they could have written anything to annoy Trump? Meanwhile we're still waiting, even if Trump stated before he'd let the people read the report. Now it probably more like with his tax papers "the people are not interested". ""It was an illegal investigation. It was started illegally. Everything about it was crooked," the president told reporters outside the White House before departing on a day trip to Texas. The president also claimed Mueller and his investigators, charged with probing allegations that the president's 2016 campaign colluded with the Russian government, "were people that truly hated Donald Trump." ... "As far as I'm concerned, I don't care about the Mueller report," the president said." www.politico.eu/article/trump-mueller-probe-attempted-coup/
|
|
rubl
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
The wondering type
Posts: 23,529
Likes: 8,892
|
Post by rubl on Apr 18, 2019 22:15:58 GMT 7
Big news today! Barr said there was no obstruction of justice. Trump might have just been a bit angry, probably justifiably so. That's all. According to Barr that is. Thanks to official statements like this we the normal people will have plenty of opportunities to get rid of our worries. We're not obstructing, we're not fumbling with our tax papers. We're just following that great, real great example called Trump
|
|
rubl
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
The wondering type
Posts: 23,529
Likes: 8,892
|
Post by rubl on Apr 22, 2019 20:39:26 GMT 7
No, I haven't looked yet.
Still one thing intrigues me. If Trump and his WH people are right in thrashing Mueller and his report, how is it possible that that report totally exonerates Trump?
|
|
rubl
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
The wondering type
Posts: 23,529
Likes: 8,892
|
Post by rubl on Apr 23, 2019 22:31:49 GMT 7
The Mueller report, with compliments from William Barr hisself. He hopes you like the black he put in, he tried to make it more playful as in 'connect the black' www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdfThis link gives you a PDF which supports search. Size 50.2Mb, bit slow site though. src.bna.com/Htn
|
|
rubl
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
The wondering type
Posts: 23,529
Likes: 8,892
|
Post by rubl on Apr 24, 2019 11:05:58 GMT 7
Well, well, Kushner has been heard from. Maybe the Mueller report made him feel uncomfortable. Need to blame someone and Mueller is an ideal target. After all the Russian didn't really do much harm and America has no problem with Russians interfering. They're just a different type of Jews "Kushner: Mueller probe was ‘more harmful’ to US than Russian election interference Kushner claims Russia’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 election amounted to ‘a couple Facebook ads.’" www.politico.eu/article/kushner-mueller-probe-was-more-harmful-to-us-than-russian-election-interference/
|
|
rubl
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
The wondering type
Posts: 23,529
Likes: 8,892
|
Post by rubl on Apr 24, 2019 22:03:24 GMT 7
Well, although the Mueller report completely exonerated dearDonaldTrump, it would seem it's still necessary to keep on the pressure of suggesting Mueller was prejudiced, taking money to do his 'work'. Again Trump seems to be uncapable of understanding that he can't have it both ways. Either the report exonerated his and Mueller did his job accurately and correctly, or Mueller was biassed, had 12/13/19 angry democrats, lots of money to write his report in which case it would clearly NOT exonerate Trump and have no good legal value. Trump is just muddling the waters again, as usual. "Trump says he’ll turn to Supreme Court if Congress begins impeachment Trump claimed in a tweet that Mueller’s report was written by a team biased against him with ‘unlimited money.’ U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he would turn to the Supreme Court if the House of Representatives moves to impeach him, though it is unclear what role the nation’s highest court could play if the president were to seek its help in such a situation. Trump claimed in a tweet posted Wednesday morning that special counsel Robert Mueller’s report was written by a team biased against him with “unlimited money” for an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Still, he said, the report “didn’t lay a glove on me.” “I DID NOTHING WRONG,” Trump said. “If the partisan Dems ever tried to Impeach, I would first head to the U.S. Supreme Court.” Although Trump claimed he would seek the Supreme Court's help if the House were to impeach him, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in 1993 that authority for impeachment trials resides in Congress and ”nowhere else.”" www.politico.eu/article/trump-impeachment-supreme-court-mueller-russia/
|
|