|
Post by Fletchsmile on Jul 8, 2019 20:22:23 GMT 7
Personally my investment portfolio for retirement has long assumed equity exposures, but a few thoughts in the article anyway..
=====================================================
Why de-risking your pension could force you back to work post-retirement
08 July 2019 Securities Trust of Scotland’s Mark Whitehead says lengthening lifespans mean savers cannot just switch into bonds after they retire. Post By Eve Maddock-Jones By Eve Maddock-Jones, Reporter, FE Trustnet Most investors will not have enough money saved to fund their retirement as they are stuck in the “old fashioned” cycle of de-risking into bonds when they stop working, which will not provide enough income to fund ever-lengthening lifespans. This is according to Securities Trust of Scotland’s Mark Whitehead (pictured) , who says this failure to adapt has led to the emergence of the ‘grey zone’ where people will have to continue working after their official retirement date. “We need income in retirement,” he explained. “The first stage of preparing for this is your savings lifecycle. “We’re all saving for our pension funds and that’s the growth stage, where you need to make sure that you maximise the growth potential of your assets. Then, when you come to retirement age, you know that you have to have a large savings pot, and the larger the better because you can draw income from that and use that for your retirement.”
|
|
|
Post by rgs2001uk on Jul 8, 2019 21:38:31 GMT 7
Personally my invest portfolio for retirement will include two gold plated index linked final salary pensions, the pommie oap will be nothing more than pocket money, that’s if I live long enough to get one.
|
|
AyG
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 4,555
|
Post by AyG on Jul 9, 2019 7:52:59 GMT 7
It was much simpler (and fairer) in the days of final salary pensions. Thanks to the Tories with their incompetent meddling, their contempt for the workers and love of big corporations the risk is now all taken by the workers. Is it really fair that someone in or approaching retirement should face the risk of losing 40 or 50% of their pension capital thanks to market fluctuations outside their control? No, it's simply inhumane. It all just serves to remind us (as if anyone was in any doubt), that MPs don't represent the people who vote for them, but work for their their own selfish interests.
Unfortunately annuities, which are a good (though unpopular) solution to income uncertainty in retirement, pay poorly thanks to the government's inept management of the economy with unnaturally low interest rates.
|
|