|
Post by Soutpeel on Feb 5, 2016 8:29:08 GMT 7
and this is one of the most annoying aspects of this whole refugee thing...how many refugee's have the "oil rich" Muslim states taken in ? As usual its the soft arsed, PC, liberal, huggy feely, bleeding heart western European countries who have fallen for this as the actions of few created the political voids which started this, the actions of certain western governments in allowing uncontrolled refugee movement into Europe is going to provide the environment and catalyst for "civil wars" in some Western Countries when the "natives" really get fed up with the refugee thing.. I read somewhere the UK has put GBP 1.3 Billion on the table for refugees, but cant find the cash to look after its own citizens...
|
|
AyG
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 4,555
|
Post by AyG on Feb 5, 2016 9:18:37 GMT 7
Meanwhile the Saudis do nothing. But then, why should they do anything? America and Europe's leaders have been fools and betrayed their peoples by letting these economic migrants into their lands, whilst attracting them with benefits and bending over backwards to accommodate their foul ways. We should have been like Saudi Arabia and kept them out. Let them stay in their own Moslem hell holes, rather than let them into the West to reduced civilisation to their own miserable standards.
|
|
|
Post by Soutpeel on Feb 5, 2016 10:24:24 GMT 7
Meanwhile the Saudis do nothing. But then, why should they do anything? America and Europe's leaders have been fools and betrayed their peoples by letting these economic migrants into their lands, whilst attracting them with benefits and bending over backwards to accommodate their foul ways. We should have been like Saudi Arabia and kept them out. Let them stay in their own Moslem hell holes, rather than let them into the West to reduced civilisation to their own miserable standards. Its a fair comment sure, but one would "expect" even a nominal offer of help, lets face it the Saudis are very quick to provide funding for a new mosque in the UK, they have a better infrastructure to house many of these refugees, due to the "tent cities" they have set up for the annual Haj and if Islam is the faith of brotherly love, it professes to be, sure Allah wouldn't mind the Saudi's using their "tent cities" to house the needy followers of the faith and they would find favour in his eyes and a few extra virgins thrown in as thanks. I agree the Western leaders are fools...the open door policy should never have happened in the first place, there should have been reception camps set up somewhere, funded by the UN and the refugees kept there and housed and fed...similar to what the Aussies..and do not let them on Western soil...as once you do..the game is pretty much over...
|
|
me
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
Posts: 6,342
Likes: 3,980
|
Post by me on Feb 5, 2016 10:39:26 GMT 7
But then, why should they do anything? America and Europe's leaders have been fools and betrayed their peoples by letting these economic migrants into their lands, whilst attracting them with benefits and bending over backwards to accommodate their foul ways. We should have been like Saudi Arabia and kept them out. Let them stay in their own Moslem hell holes, rather than let them into the West to reduced civilisation to their own miserable standards. Its a fair comment sure, but one would "expect" even a nominal offer of help, lets face it the Saudis are very quick to provide funding for a new mosque in the UK, they have a better infrastructure to house many of these refugees, due to the "tent cities" they have set up for the annual Haj and if Islam is the faith of brotherly love, it professes to be, sure Allah wouldn't mind the Saudi's using their "tent cities" to house the needy followers of the faith and they would find favour in his eyes and a few extra virgins thrown in as thanks. I agree the Western leaders are fools...the open door policy should never have happened in the first place, there should have been reception camps set up somewhere, funded by the UN and the refugees kept there and housed and fed...similar to what the Aussies..and do not let them on Western soil...as once you do..the game is pretty much over... The very few that are not economic refugees should be handled quickly and not left for years as now. the exonomic refugees should be isolatedd as you say however they should not be just left behind the wire wih all the time in the world for the malcontents to spread their message of terror among them. The people in the camp should have a choice....work to build the camp and run it for some of the year and school for the rest or school all the year and only basic support. All should attend school regardless of age and be taught the basics of literacy and trade skills. They should be taught history and culture of other countries too. that way when and if they are ever returned to their country (wwhich all refugees should be if safe after regime change) they have a basis to live and enough knowledge not to fall for the misinformation of the malcontents.
|
|
AyG
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 4,555
|
Post by AyG on Feb 5, 2016 12:09:46 GMT 7
But then, why should they do anything? America and Europe's leaders have been fools and betrayed their peoples by letting these economic migrants into their lands, whilst attracting them with benefits and bending over backwards to accommodate their foul ways. We should have been like Saudi Arabia and kept them out. Let them stay in their own Moslem hell holes, rather than let them into the West to reduced civilisation to their own miserable standards. Its a fair comment sure, but one would "expect" even a nominal offer of help, lets face it the Saudis are very quick to provide funding for a new mosque in the UK The Saudis (in their eyes) are the true Moslems, and all non-Arab Moslems are inferior. They feel disdain for them and no obligation to help them. However, they place great store by spreading their "true" version of Islam - hence the obsession with building mosques around the world designed to spread the extremist Wahabi doctrine. Whilst Islam requires alms giving (zakat), it's not based upon charity, but the selfish aim of purifying one's wealth. The money can be given to the poor, but can equally be given to jihadi terrorists fighting in the name of Islam. Where the money is given to the poor, the Saudis give it to poor Saudis since they are "true" Moslems. So, personally, I would expect the Saudis to do nothing to helps. After all, the plight of the migrants is the will of Allah. Who would want to thwart the wishes of a callous and vengeful god that people suffer?
|
|