Ah, I think I have an idea who it is:cool::cool:

Funny, no one has any evidence of that - only your imagination and tender sensitivities at hearing an unbiased view of history for a change.

Carry on calling me names in lieu of any facts.  Typical INTERNET warriors. It's about time you fellows realized I'm not anti British but you are in fact overly sensitive. 

More kindergarten name calling.  Can't someone come up with some examples of my anti British Rhetoric?  Or is all you fellows can do is call me names?  And silly insulting pictures.  Anuban 3 stuff.  There must be some adults you can ask for help?

You see, there is your problem, every time someone says something about Trump you think that they are anti American.
The majority of people on this board think that Trump is an egotistical, bigoted, idiotical clown, without prejudice of where he is from.
The reason why he is so talked about is because if he wins the election then he becomes the most powerful man on earth and therefore the most dangerous man on earth.
We are not against Trump because he's an American, we are worried that one day this man will hold the same seat of power as Abraham Lincoln did but every time that someone voices an opinion about the man with the funny wig, you accuse them of being anti American and then go on to try to ruin the reputations of famous Brits as a reprisal.

Wind your fricken neck in CMK, we don't do hate on the Big Mango.
Lighten up and understand that not everything is anti American.
Why should we be anti 'our closest allies for the last 100 years' when we can concentrate our efforts against the Australians, who were only our second closest allies?

Oh Lord, give me strength............................

Take your own advice you might benefit from it,somehow though I doubt it.

Trolls and social misfits like yourself who suffer with chronic mental issues never could understand or accept the truth.

Name calling again.  Grow up.  It is my experience that by Prathom 1 many Thai children have grown out of pure name calling insults and switch to fact based insults.  You say Rhodes is a hero to be respected and I say Cecil Rhodes is a scoundrel, racist who caused irreparable harm to Africa and back that up with quotes from Rhodes himself and your rebuttal is name calling with no discussion of the facts or issues.  That is, in my opinion Anuban 3 level argument level. 

If you were in Anuban 3 your behavior would be appropriate.  However as an adult it's not. 

BBC says, "BBC unveils a Victorian hero - a money-mad, racist, closet gay."  When I say the same thing I'm engaging in anti British rhetoric?  Get it BBC OK.  CMK chronic mental issues.  So who has the real problems?

Maybe you have learned something about Rhodes tonight and that would be positive.  I learned about the Scramble for Africa and Churchill's hiccup and things about Bernard Montgomery that I never knew and TE Lawrence I never knew about the young boy statue stuff. 

Education never ceases.