|
Post by Soutpeel on Apr 14, 2017 14:54:46 GMT 7
New war zone in korea ? What you reckon, given Trumpton has just dropped the biggest FO firework they have on the Afghanis/Taliban/isis
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2017 15:00:59 GMT 7
I think he should. With the agreement ( and assistance ) of the Chinese.
Best outcome would be a Chinese puppet government - it would suit everybody.
|
|
oldie
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
Posts: 5,779
Likes: 4,593
|
Post by oldie on Apr 14, 2017 15:10:40 GMT 7
Maybe just snuff Kim and leave the poor peasants be.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2017 15:39:19 GMT 7
Maybe just snuff Kim and leave the poor peasants be. I hope when they take out that fat little grub that all his stupid big-hatted generals are with him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2017 15:56:44 GMT 7
You can't just wipe out Kim. He's easily replaced.
Nuke the whole country , wait 500 years and let the south move in.
|
|
AyG
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 4,555
|
Post by AyG on Apr 14, 2017 18:11:14 GMT 7
I think he should. With the agreement ( and assistance ) of the Chinese. Best outcome would be a Chinese puppet government - it would suit everybody. I suspect the Chinese government would not acquiesce. They wouldn't want to have to deal with the potential flood of refugees and the instability on their border in the aftermath.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2017 18:27:01 GMT 7
I agree once again, my furry little friend. For what it's worth, I believe the Chinese will turn Trump around and put him back in his box with his hackles up. China don't want no honky chin checkin' their brothers in da hood.
|
|
smokie36
Vigilante
Posts: 15,664
Likes: 9,066
|
Post by smokie36 on Apr 14, 2017 18:29:36 GMT 7
I voted no cos I like a close finish.
|
|
siampolee
Detective
Alive alive O
Posts: 14,106
Likes: 8,932
|
Post by siampolee on Apr 14, 2017 20:11:23 GMT 7
And I voted NO because the Chinese have got both Tronald Dump and large chunks of American money due by the balls.
|
|
rubl
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
The wondering type
Posts: 23,600
Likes: 8,956
Member is Online
|
Post by rubl on Apr 14, 2017 20:14:45 GMT 7
People who like to win and raise the stakes and have the keys to the American War Arsenal don't make the world a safer place.
59 cruise missiles to 'show' something 1 GBU-43/B to kill 36 ISIS terrorists and 'show' something
Now waiting for a description of the something and where it's supposed to lead to.
I voted no, as the yes has 'invade' which is unlikely and will annoy Trumps voters and 'nuke'm' is too controversial even for Trump (I hope).
|
|
buhi
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 1,431
|
Post by buhi on Apr 14, 2017 20:17:32 GMT 7
You can't just wipe out Kim. He's easily replaced. Nuke the whole country , wait 500 years and let the south move in. Love it. You will wait 500 years? Get a brain.
|
|
bowie
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
Posts: 2,592
Likes: 698
|
Post by bowie on Apr 14, 2017 20:28:27 GMT 7
I'm at home. Wife left early with family to visit the stupas of ancestors. Son stayed with me until late afternoon, then went to be with his cousins to throw water. Just phoned wife, she answered, that was all i wanted to hear and son? "He is here,". 500 years?
|
|
|
Post by Soutpeel on Apr 14, 2017 20:43:11 GMT 7
And I voted NO because the Chinese have got both Tronald Dump and large chunks of American money due by the balls. I would agree with you except for one important aspect, Trumpton and the Chinese chappie have been together in meetings in recent times, and maybe China has given their blessing to Trumpton to slap Lil Kim around a bit, Something is brewing as China Air has just suspended all flights from China to the glorious workers Republic of the North, was on the Beeb not 10 minutes ago, they know something is going down app.scmp.com/scmp/mobile/index.html#/article/2087773/desktop
|
|
rubl
Crazy Mango Extraordinaire
The wondering type
Posts: 23,600
Likes: 8,956
Member is Online
|
Post by rubl on Apr 14, 2017 20:57:13 GMT 7
And I voted NO because the Chinese have got both Tronald Dump and large chunks of American money due by the balls. I would agree with you except for one important aspect, Trumpton and the Chinese chappie have been together in meetings in recent times, and maybe China has given their blessing to Trumpton to slap Lil Kim around a bit, Something is brewing as China Air has just suspended all flights from China to the glorious workers Republic of the North, was on the Beeb not 10 minutes ago, they know something is going down app.scmp.com/scmp/mobile/index.html#/article/2087773/desktopI doubt the Chinese agreed to invasion and I also doubt the 'nuke'm'. Maybe rewrite the "invade or nuke' into 'drop some impressive great, real great and loud bunker blasters'
|
|
|
Post by rgs2001uk on Apr 14, 2017 20:58:26 GMT 7
When will Uncle Sam ever learn,let sleeping dogs lie.
Not his backyard, not his problem.
Everytime Uncle Sam goes on an overseas jaunt it ends in dog shyt.
Consider this scenario, China invades and incorporates the Nth into part of Middle Earth, negating the need for the 30,000 plus troops Uncle Sam has on the Korean penninsula.
For Uncle Sam, the fat bastid with the three stooges haircut is too thick to join the dots, the MOAB dropped in Afghanistan was nothing to do with ISIS but all about sending a bunker bombing message to the Dear Deluded One.
|
|