I could have sworn I saw a bottle of Calvados in Foodland the other day for not a lot of money. Been back since but not to be seen.
As I am currently "off it", not really much point, but it is a good thought. Not had Calvados for decades.
No doubt the usual suspects will be jumping up and down saying it is available everywhere for peanuts.

I thought he walks on water, isnt this the same guy who claims papal infallability?

What is it they say about glass houses?


Anyway back on topic, why hasnt the nazi been rounded up yet?

The Zionists seem to be bringing everyone, cooks and guards and clerks to account, why does the nazi get a free pass?

Since I already have my queue number for the stake I guess I won't make things worse by saying YES 

BTW the Papal infallibility was 'proclaimed' in the late 19th century if I remember correctly. Also it would only apply under clearly defined circumstances like only related to matters of faith. Of course, to some that already went too far.

PS did a quick search. Memory (still) serves me 

WARNING: CATHOLIC WEBSITE AHEAD

"The dogma of infallibility was formally proclaimed at the First Vatican Council in 1870. There are several requirements for a dogmatic, papal infallible pronouncement: (1) The pronouncement must be made by the lawful successor to Peter. (2) The subject matter must be in the area of faith and morals. (3) The pope must be speaking ex cathedra, that is from the very seat and office of Peter. In this way he must be specifically intending to proclaim a doctrine, binding the entire Church to its assent. If one or more of these elements is missing, there is no infallible pronouncement. Most "examples" of papal "errors" emerge when critics ignore the necessity of these three points. (Madrid, pp. 135-136, Pope Fiction)"
www.catholicfaithandreason.org/papal-infallibility.html

Opinions, opinions.

BTW I don't think this Pope ever 'claimed' and it's more like the law of land. As for inherently, up to a point it's a bit like it being a crime to insult a monarch.

Anyway, I learned while in the army that you can be punished for what you say, but not for what you think. Extrapolating that would also apply to the Pope when he keep his mouth shut. 

via Associated Press

""Pope urges Thai Catholics to practice faith despite majority Buddhist country
Pope Francis ministered to Thailand’s tiny Catholic community Friday, urging Thais young and old to practice their faith with joy and with “a Thai face and flesh” in an overwhelmingly Buddhist country.

Thousands of Thais welcomed Francis as he traveled to St. Peter’s Parish, a Catholic community outside Bangkok, to pray at the sanctuary of Thailand’s first martyred priest.

There, he told a few hundred priests and nuns that he read “with some pain” that for many Thais, Christianity is “a religion for foreigners.”

“This should spur us to find ways to talk about the faith in dialect, like a mother who sings lullabies to her child,” he said. “With that same intimacy, let us give faith a Thai face and flesh, which involves much more than making translations.”

Children dressed as monks and nuns, as well as real clergy and ordinary Catholics, cheered him as he passed through the crowd outside the church in his popemobile and later on foot. “Viva il papa,” or “Long live the pope,” they shouted in Italian."
nypost.com/2019/11/22/pope-urges-thai-catholics-to-practice-faith-despite-majority-buddhist-country/"

The thread is examining his authority, and I would say he comes out lacking.

Total breach of forum rules........remember on topic posts are not allowed.